City Council members balked at a new contract with the El Paso Municipal Police Officers Association that will add nearly $12 million to police salaries in the next four years before approving it on a 5-2 vote Tuesday.
The agreement will push salaries for uniformed officers in the 1,100-member force from about $81.6 million to $93.4 million over the term of the contract, which runs a year longer than usual.
City Reps, Steve Ortega and Beto O’Rourke voted against the contract but not because of the annual raises that start at $1.8 million for the fiscal year starting Sept. 1 and peak at $3.9 million in three years.
They were troubled over the council’s lack of involvement in policy decisions made in the negotiations, including concessions by the city’s negotiating team that will restrict the use of polygraph examinations in internal investigations and impose a new 48-hour waiting period before an officer involved in a shooting can be questioned or be asked to participate in a “walk-through” retracing the events that led to a shooting.
While Police Chief Greg Allen and the head of the police union, Bobby Holguin, supported those changes, former Chief Richard Wiles and the police union's former attorney, Bill Ellis, appeared before City Council to oppose them.
Wiles, who retired as chief late last year and later announced he would run for sheriff, said he reinstituted the use of the polygraph, which the department had abandoned as an investigative tool 20 years before.
“I felt I had an obligation to the public to use every tool available to me to get to the truth of the matter,” Wiles said. “I still support it, but I understand there’s some people who don’t and if they choose not to use it, I think that’s fine.
“But I just want it to be clear to the public, because I think you owe them that, that this contract is going to eliminate the polygraph.”
That is because officers under investigation can refuse a polygraph exam by an Internal Affairs officer and insist on an independent examiner.
Then, Wiles said, if the officer exercises his new right under the contract to refuse to sign a waiver relieving the outside examiner of liability, the examiner will refuse to administer the examination.
Chris Borunda, a former assistant city attorney whom the city hired to assist in the negotiations, said an officer who refuses the polygraph leaves himself open to harsh disciplinary measures by the police chief.
She said the polygraph is still a questionable and subjective tool, the results of which are not admissible in courts.
“The United States Supreme Court says that polygraph examinations, even a polygraph expert, can only surmise, can only offer opinions,” she said. “There is no scientific, there is no factual basis for anything that is given as part of a polygraph examination.”
City Rep. Eddie Holguin noted that the state of New Mexico is now allowing polygraph results in its courts.
The new contract also moves the time at which an officer can be asked to take a polygraph exam to the very end of the investigation and then only after all other leads have been exhausted.
Ellis, who said the contract “coddles” police officers, noted that the agreement allows the union to suggest investigative leads that the department would then have to pursue, thus injecting the union into investigations aimed at its members.
That, Ellis said, will bog down investigations and push the department against new deadlines for imposing internal discipline measures or taking steps to criminally prosecute an officer.
Wiles also wondered why the city and management would support giving an officer involved in a shooting 48 hours to gather his thoughts before questioning him about the events.
“When CAP (Crimes Against Persons) handles a homicide, they don’t allow witnesses to go home and rest,” he said. “They’ve just witnessed a murder, their relative killed? They don’t get to go home and rest.
“They’re taken down to the CAP office, and they sit there for hours until CAP gets statements.”
He and Ellis also questioned why the city agreed not to permit the video recording of a post-shooting “walk through” with an officer.
Borunda said the problem with questioning officers immediately after a shooting that may be traumatic is that they often remember additional and conflicting details when they have had a chance to rest.
“So it’s to the city’s interest, it’s to the officer’s interest, it’s to everyone’s interest to ensure that the statement you get is the best statement that can be given, that it’s useful,” she said.
Allen said, “When you use deadly force against someone, it is not a casual event. … That is an impactful thing that a lot of times makes people quit this job. I’ve seen it several times in my career.
“Chief Wiles believed in it. Philosophically, we are opposed on this, and I respect him deeply. But some of the things we have been talking about today are to guarantee both the rights of the officer and to make sure that we protect the city.”
City Rep. Rachel Quintana asked Allen and the union’s Bobby Holguin if they are comfortable with the proposed contract.
“I feel comfortable with the contract, yes I do,” Allen said. “The polygraph laid dormant for 20 years, and the big question is why. If it’s such a valid tool, why?
“And, yes, the public does deserve the best that it can get from this department and the integrity of the officers that serve this city, but that has never been an issue. Never.”
Holguin said, “Don’t get comfortable mixed up with happy, OK? I’m not happy with it all, but I am comfortable with it.”
The new contract does authorize random drug testing of 30 percent of the police force a year versus the previous contract that allowed drug tests only when there was cause for suspicion.
The new contract also significantly reduces the cost of the generous health benefits plan for police officer by requiring them to pay a share of their medical expenses.
In response to Ortega’s questions about why the council was not involved in the negotiating process and policy directions, City Manager Joyce Wilson said negotiations have traditionally been conducted by the city’s top management and a negotiating team.
Then, once the contract is ratified by the union members, it is brought to the council to be approved or rejected.
That, she said, is how she handled the previous negotiations with the police and firefighter unions and how negotiations have always been conducted in El Paso, going back to the time before she was hired when the mayor was the city’s chief executive officer.
To reach David Crowder, write to dcrowder@epmediagroup.com or call (915) 351-0605.


















Ken G
August 27, 2008
Our uniformed officers, police and fire, are the city's largest budget item. We have to pay enough to recruit, train and retain these important officers. Measures to ensure the integrity of these officers is equally important. The taxpayers need to believe these officers are honest. Any investigation should be transparent.
Bill
August 27, 2008
Police are a mammoth leach on the city. They are the reason taxes are sky high. Burying your head in the sand and nitpicking the rest of the budget is the pasttime of those who are beholden or fearful of the cops.
Carl Starr
August 27, 2008
Is Garrity even mentioned in the contract? What the city has done is taken a valuable tool off the table. Most police depts to not give a officer 2 days to consult with a private attorney to refresh their memory before giving a statement. Most Depts give a 'Garrity Warning' within a hour or two of a police shooting.
William
August 28, 2008
The changes in the Internal Affairs provisions of the contract are good for only one thing: protecting the bad apples. For example, truthful officers have no reason to be concerned with polygraphs. Untruthful officers have even reason to fear them, and the new contract gives them the ability, with some legal maneuvering, to avoid the test. Giving officers 48 hours before giving statements in deadly force cases provides plenty of time for those so inclined to bend the facts to suit their purposes. With 2 exceptions the ratification of this agreement is a profound failure of insight and leadership.
j.j.
August 28, 2008
Great reporting. An important story not covered by the other media outlets.
Carl Starr
August 28, 2008
The New York Times May 10, 2002 Friday Late Edition - Final
Ruling May Doom Regulation On Questioning Police Officers
BYLINE: By WILLIAM K. RASHBAUM SECTION: Section B; Column 5; Metropolitan Desk; Pg. 3 LENGTH: 755 words
A much-criticized Police Department regulation that bars for two days the interrogation of officers suspected of misconduct can no longer be negotiated into the police union's contract with the city, a state hearing officer has ruled. Police officials said yesterday that they planned to use the ruling to eliminate the regulation.
"It is the intention of the city to see to it, as with all the other police unions, that the 48-hour rule be eliminated," Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly said yesterday.
The hearing officer's ruling was hailed by some state and federal prosecutors, and by other critics of the regulation.
"It's a long-overdue reform that hopefully will help the truth-seeking function in police investigations," said a senior federal prosecutor who has handled a number of police corruption cases and would speak only on condition of anonymity.
The rule was cited in a civil lawsuit brought against the city, the Police Department and the P.B.A. by Abner Louima after he was tortured in a station house in 1997. Lawyers for Mr. Louima, who settled the lawsuit for $7.1 million from the city and $1.6 million from the union, have argued that the rule interfered with the investigation of the officers who assaulted him and those who shot and killed Amadou Diallo in 1999.
"It's a critical issue," said Barry C. Scheck, one of Mr. Louima's lawyers. He praised Commissioner Kelly for moving to eliminate the rule, and former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani, who had long opposed it.
Carl Starr
August 29, 2008
NYTimes on 48 Hour Rule
http://2url.org?48hrRule
vato
August 29, 2008
On our way to the big Police State. In that El Paso is ahead of the curve. Sad.
Concern
September 2, 2008
Can we have a breakdown on the new salaries for these police officers? A total amount does not give the public a good idea of what type of salaries were given.