The Drug War raging in Juarez is just the open manifestation of a low-level conflict border residents have lived with for years, said one panelist at a UTEP forum that was organized by the student newspaper "The Prospector" and the Sam Donaldson Center for Communication Studies earlier this week.
Calling the drug underworld a "parallel reality," Ruben Olague, former assignments editor for El Diario de El Paso, said journalists ought to do more work to understand the world that all border residents share -- for example, the common story of the guy who grew up next door, went to school with us, perhaps still attends our church or community center, and is part of the drug economy.,
It was one point in a wide-ranging discussion of the challenges faced by reporters covering Mexico, considered one of the most dangerous countries in which to work as a journalist. The panelists were Olague, Alfredo Corchado, Mexico Bureau chief for the Dallas Morning News, Angela Kocherga, Mexico Bureau Chief for KHOU TV in Houston, Diana Washington Valdez, a reporter for the El Paso Times who has covered Juarez extensively, and Sandra Rodriguez of El Diario de Juarez. The event was moderated by ABC-7 anchor Ken Molestina.
The panelists discussed examples of courageous reporters and institutions in Mexico, and the cost of doing the job. They gave some general advice on reporting in Mexico -- "strategize" before going in by lining up some research and organizing the itinerary beforehand, don't go alone, let someone know where you're going -- and said now is not the time for inexperienced reporters to take chances. As Kocherga said, "It's not the time to randomly go look for the 'big story.' "
Said Corchado, explaining that he has turned down opportunities to interview high-level drug traffickers: "For me the story is important. Is it worth my life? No." Once met face-to-face, he said, they assume a personal connection that can turn deadly.
One impetus for the discussion was the recent death of Armando Rodriguez, a Diario de Juarez reporter shot Nov. 13. [link] In the days that followed, another news outlet shut down temporarily, as threats to reporters escalated. [link]
One question from the audience was whether the cartels know the journalists or pay attention to the news. That led to a brief description of how the cartels work -- earlier, Corchado had stated that an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 people work for organized crime in Mexico.
The organizations are increasingly sophisticated, as any corporation, with people assigned to the various tasks of keeping the operation going. That means there are accountants, lawyers, enforcers, transportation specialists, and, Valdez noted, people or units assigned to intelligence, which includes reading and watching the news.
Corchado said that a few years ago, his newspaper wanted to send bodyguards to protect the reporters. That involves its own dangers, since bodyguards aren't always reliable, sometimes turning on their employers.
Despite the dangers, there are those who do risk their lives to tell the stories.
Valdez mentioned the Tijuana outfit Zeta, a publication co-founded by Jesus Blancornelas, who survived an assassination attempt and died of natural causes in 2006. [link] She also mentioned, at the national level, Proceso, which recently was in Juarez to do a story about the situation at Lomas de Poleo. [link]
But, she said, there aren't enough of those examples, and they're up against not only the drug cartels but also a corrupt system -- the cartels could not exist as they do, she said, without the support of government officials.
That led Olague to question what happens when the burst of violence subsides: "Do we go back to the way we were?"














George McNenney
November 28, 2008
Where were the current or former law enforcement border upper level managers in this gathering to add input to the group? As a former US Customs Special Agent in Charge in West texas and New Mexico, I believe that inviting upper level managers Federal law enforcement managers to this type of reunions will add value.
elrubio
November 29, 2008
NPT,
There are no postings here because no one believes your story that the corruption is the sole repsonsibility of Juarez, Chihuahua, and Mexico. It is not, the drug war started here, and we can put an end to it -right from here where it all started. The people of this country should insist we put an end to it, now that we can all agree and admit the prohibition approach will not work.
Juarez is not another world of some other country, some far off place to be excluded or discounted as not our problem. These same problems we see in Juarez have been going on in South America for some time, since the inception of the war on drugs, and now that its arrived at our borders we're still going to insist we can somehow turn it around and win?
As if we don't have corruption here, that Americans may be above such turpitude .........
Wake up America, we cannot continue with this prohibition. We know it has NOT accomplished security and stability for neither the foreign countries nor our domestic cities. We know we've already spent way too much money on this loss cause. We know that although illegal it's a multi-billion dollar secondary economy for our very own people here in America -not just El Paso.
The lack of attention to El Paso and Juarez by Austin and DC is only a small part of the problem. The local approach by the public, Utep, NPT, and ABC can be even more significant. What do I mean, give you an example? "Maybe we'll just once again agree with the state and federal government that building a wall should somehow help solve the problem." But we'll not blame it all on Texas.
Other southwest states are just as guilty ......... That's correct; AZ, NM, and CA are just as guilty ........
And I do understand that while the public may not have as much clout and say in these matters of erecting billion dollar communist walls -Utep and NPT-ABC do. You cannot hide the problem, you address it and solve it by finding the root cause .........
Ken G
November 29, 2008
The disintegration of law and order in Juarez and Chihauhau is appalling but there is little we can do.
joan
November 30, 2008
Why is America to blame for the drug wars?
The Mexicans are the cause of the drug war...they have free will. They can raise the standard of living for average citizen, they have ample natural resources, they could protect thier daughters from the unspeakable terror that is part of their daily existence. They could treat their elders with respect ...they could love thier children enough to demand social reform instead of signing to to be vicitims generation after generation.
Instead of an illegal exdous out of Mexico they could stand and fight for they own country instead of blaming another country for THEIR PROBLEMS
El Pasoan in DC
December 1, 2008
Dear NPT,
Great article. The plight of journalists is only the beginning of a very grave human rights situation in Mexico. A recent hearing at the Inter-American Commission for Human Rights in Washington, DC highlighted the legal and political obstacles to ensuring that the Mexican government's war on drugs respects human rights and human dignity. A group of NGOs from Mexico City spoke about abuses committed at military checkpoints throughout the country, including summary executions, rapes and arbitrary arrests. The state of Chihuahua by far has suffered the largest numbers of drug-related homicides in the country throughout 2008.
You can listen to the hearing in Spanish at the following link: http://www.cidh.org/Audiencias/select.aspx
Click on Wednesday, October 22, 2008 and look for "impact of public security policies on human rights in Mexico."
While the situation is clearly one for the Mexican government to address, the Untied States has a large part to play given that we are the number one consumer of Mexican drugs. Moreover, the U.S. government is spending taxpayer dollars to train Mexican military and other law enforcement officials in tactics which have not lead to any measurable reduction in violence and have lead to an increase in human rights abuses.
It would be interesting to see more articles like this one. Best wishes
elrubio
December 2, 2008
Joan,
I do not wish to blame it all on America, I am not an iconoclast, and I should not suggest anyone is naïve; maybe I just need to get my butt out there and try harder …… really do something instead of sitting here trying to sound intelligent and finger-pointing or implying. It just seems that we sit behind a veil of lies when it comes to this issue and always bounce the problem off this or that, shifting the blame. It’s always something other than the war on drugs; that it’s our society, the uneducated, non-democratic nations, the security issue, and we can go on with excuses.
For Pete’s sake, since we’re bouncing the problem and blame-game all over the place, why don’t we just go ahead and blame it on the native plants in Colombia, Afghanistan, and Bolivia … :) There’s more to laugh at though, that they’ve actually attempted to eradicate some plants, how ridiculous is that?!? There’s been a civil war in Colombia for over thirty years, we’ve had to physically remove Panama’s leader, the top-dog in the Mexican DEA was disgracefully removed, and we’ve even connected our problems with terrorism and the Afghan War as a drug-trafficking issue.
And I do apologize to those who may be offended or concerned, believing they may lose out should this billion-dollar secondary economy collapse. If you’re on the illegal side then you’re more than welcome to legitimize your business, and if you’re on the watch within our law enforcement, don’t worry because we can sure use your talents elsewhere. I do not wish to smoke a joint, desire any other illicit drugs, nor would I recommend drug use; Bud Lite is more than enough for me. I’m just a concerned America, an American who genuinely cares about these United States.
I will just shut up now, wish ya’ll a happy holiday, and just be ever grateful I have this internet :)
joan
December 3, 2008
elrubio,
Iconoclast...a person who attacks or ridicules traditional or venerated insitutions or ideas regarded by him as erroneous or based on superstition......Webster's dictionary.
That noun itself is implying that an American culture is based on the use of illegal drugs. I say it is not based on drug use but it used within different circles in different degrees.
You sound sweet, so I will leave it at that with one closing thought.
If we lived next to France, then would France have these same drug wars?
So, is it us or Mexico that is the problem?
I hope you have a wonderful holiday too and enjoy that Bud Lite while you enter the New Year.
Wishing you the best that life has to offer.... hope, peace , love and gentle aging process
elrubio
December 6, 2008
Joan,
Why do you feel compelled to bring up age, I'm not that old? :) And what about that dictionary definition? I used the word intentionally, and ended my comment reitirating my position on this country, that I do care about America. I sincerely love these United States.
The founding "war on drug" policy tied to conservative ideological principles which state that marihuana may somehow be evil is an evil fabrication itself. I'm a concerned citizen, not a dissident, and that's the context in which the word "iconoclast" was used.
If alcohol, tabacco, and caffeine can be processed, packaged, and sold and we're dealing with their related problems than we should move forward in a differnt direction. A NEW progressive approach instead of OLD arrogant fabrications and defiant philosophies.
Peace 2 U 2